Nisbet v Secretary of State & Ors [2007] EWHC 1768 (Admin) (29 June 2007)

Nisbet v Secretary of State & Ors [2007] EWHC 1768 (Admin) (29 June 2007)

The claimant's health conditions and personal circumstances did not meet the threshold for unjust or oppressive extradition under Section 91, nor did they engage or breach his rights under Articles 6 or 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Secretary of State was statutorily bound to order extradition, and the appeal disclosed no grounds to overturn the order.

Citation
[2007] EWHC 1768 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Stanley Nisbet; First Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Second Defendant: Government of Canada
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 June 2007
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Extradition Appeal / High Court Appeal Against Extradition Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Extradition to Canada, Compatibility With European Convention on Human Rights, Physical and Mental Health in Extradition, Article 6 Right to Fair Trial, Article 8 Right to Private and Family Life, Secretary of State's Role in Extradition Process
Extradition Law Human Rights Law Criminal Law Extradition to Canada Compatibility With European Convention on Human Rights Physical and Mental Health in Extradition Article 6 Right to Fair Trial Article 8 Right to Private and Family Life +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stanley Nisbet

Claimant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

First Defendant

Government of Canada

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Extradition Appeal / High Court Appeal Against Extradition Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether extradition would be unjust or oppressive due to claimant's physical or mental condition
  2. 2 Whether extradition would breach claimant's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (Articles 6 and 8)
  3. 3 Whether the Secretary of State was correct in making the extradition order

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's health conditions and personal circumstances did not meet the threshold for unjust or oppressive extradition under Section 91, nor did they engage or breach his rights under Articles 6 or 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Secretary of State was statutorily bound to order extradition, and the appeal disclosed no grounds to overturn the order.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Extradition order confirmed
  • No grounds for appeal established