Central Magistrates Court Number 1 of the Spanish Criminal Court v Chadlioui [2017] EW Misc 21 (EXTRADITION) (03 October 2017)
The combination of the EAW and supplemental information provided sufficient particulars of the alleged offence, including date and place, satisfying section 2(4) of the Extradition Act 2003. The evidence established that a decision to prosecute had been made, and the RP's absence was the sole reason proceedings had not advanced, satisfying section 12A. The video interview with the Spanish judge fulfilled section 21B requirements. The interference with Article 8 rights was outweighed by the seriousness of the offence and the public interest in extradition, making the interference proportionate and necessary.
- Citation
- [2017] EW Misc 21 (EXTRADITION)
- Parties
- Requested Person (rp)/defendant: Tarik Chadlioui; Judicial Authority (ja)/requesting State: Central Magistrates' Court Number 1 of the Spanish Criminal Court
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Proceedings (part 1 Extradition Act 2003) / Judgment Following Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Extradition ordered
- Legal Topics
- Extradition Under European Arrest Warrant, Section 2(4) Extradition Act 2003 (particulars of Offence), Section 12 a Extradition Act 2003 (decision to Charge or Try), Section 21 B Extradition Act 2003 (requests for Temporary Transfer/interview), Article 8 ECHR (right to Family Life)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tarik Chadlioui
Requested Person (rp)/defendant
Central Magistrates' Court Number 1 of the Spanish Criminal Court
Judicial Authority (ja)/requesting State
Procedural Posture
Extradition Proceedings (part 1 Extradition Act 2003) / Judgment Following Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) contains sufficient particulars of the alleged offence under section 2(4) Extradition Act 2003
- 2 Whether a decision to charge or try has been made by the requesting authority under section 12A Extradition Act 2003
- 3 Whether section 21B Extradition Act 2003 (request for interview/temporary transfer) has been satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The combination of the EAW and supplemental information provided sufficient particulars of the alleged offence, including date and place, satisfying section 2(4) of the Extradition Act 2003. The evidence established that a decision to prosecute had been made, and the RP's absence was the sole reason proceedings had not advanced, satisfying section 12A. The video interview with the Spanish judge fulfilled section 21B requirements. The interference with Article 8 rights was outweighed by the seriousness of the offence and the public interest in extradition, making the interference proportionate and necessary.
Court Disposition
Extradition ordered
Orders
- Extradition of Tarik Chadlioui to Spain is ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment