Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd & Ors
The court refused Huawei's application for summary judgment and strike out, finding Unwired Planet has a real prospect of defending its FRAND compliance assertions. The construction of ETSI IPR Policy and FRAND obligations cannot be decided summarily due to factual disputes and the necessity to consider competition law context. The court allowed Unwired Planet to amend its claim to seek a declaration regarding FRAND compliance, subject to conditions requiring both parties to state their proposed licence terms for the patents in suit.
- Parties
- Claimant: Unwired Planet International Limited; First Defendant: Huawei Technologies Co. Limited; Second Defendant: Huawei Technologies (UK) Co. Limited; Third Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co. Limited; Fourth Defendant: Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited; Fifth Defendant: Google Inc.; Sixth Defendant: Google Ireland Limited; Seventh Defendant: Google Commerce Limited; Ninth Party: Unwired Planet Inc.; Tenth Party: Unwired Planet LLC; Eleventh Party: Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Competition Law / Interlocutory Judgment on Summary Judgment, Strike Out, and Amendment Applications
- Outcome
- Huawei's application for summary judgment and strike out refused; Unwired Planet's application to amend claim to seek declaration allowed with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- FRAND Licensing, Standard Essential Patents, Patent Infringement, ETSI IPR Policy, Injunctions, Portfolio Licensing, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unwired Planet International Limited
Claimant
Huawei Technologies Co. Limited
First Defendant
Huawei Technologies (UK) Co. Limited
Second Defendant
Samsung Electronics Co. Limited
Third Defendant
Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited
Fourth Defendant
Google Inc.
Fifth Defendant
Google Ireland Limited
Sixth Defendant
Google Commerce Limited
Seventh Defendant
Unwired Planet Inc.
Ninth Party
Unwired Planet LLC
Tenth Party
Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson
Eleventh Party
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Competition Law / Interlocutory Judgment on Summary Judgment, Strike Out, and Amendment Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Unwired Planet's April and July 2014 licensing proposals are compliant with FRAND obligations under ETSI IPR Policy
- 2 Whether summary judgment or strike out is appropriate regarding FRAND compliance
- 3 Whether Unwired Planet is obliged to offer single patent, standard-specific, or territory-specific licences under ETSI IPR Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused Huawei's application for summary judgment and strike out, finding Unwired Planet has a real prospect of defending its FRAND compliance assertions. The construction of ETSI IPR Policy and FRAND obligations cannot be decided summarily due to factual disputes and the necessity to consider competition law context. The court allowed Unwired Planet to amend its claim to seek a declaration regarding FRAND compliance, subject to conditions requiring both parties to state their proposed licence terms for the patents in suit.
Court Disposition
Huawei's application for summary judgment and strike out refused; Unwired Planet's application to amend claim to seek declaration allowed with conditions.
Orders
- Unwired Planet's application to amend claim to include declaration regarding FRAND compliance allowed, subject to condition that claimant and defendants state their proposed licence terms for the five patents in suit.
- Huawei's application for summary judgment and strike out of FRAND compliance assertions refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment