Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd & Anor (Rev 2)
The court held that Unwired Planet's FRAND undertaking is enforceable, that only one set of FRAND terms exists for the circumstances, and that a worldwide licence is FRAND and Unwired Planet is entitled to insist on it. The appropriate FRAND rates were determined based on comparable licences and patent counting, with adjustments. Unwired Planet did not abuse a dominant position by its conduct, and an injunction should be granted unless Huawei enters into the settled worldwide FRAND licence. None of the parties' prior offers were FRAND.
- Parties
- Claimant: Unwired Planet International Ltd; First Defendant: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd; Second Defendant: Huawei Technologies (UK) Co. Ltd; Tenth Party: Unwired Planet LLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and FRAND Licensing Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial on Non Technical (frand/competition Law/remedies) Issues
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant. Unwired Planet is entitled to an injunction unless Huawei enters into a worldwide FRAND licence on the terms settled by the court. None of the parties' prior offers were FRAND. No abuse of dominance was found.
- Legal Topics
- FRAND Licensing, Standard Essential Patents (seps), Abuse of Dominance (art 102 Tfeu), Patent Infringement, Injunctions, Royalty Rate Determination, Non Discrimination, Bundling/tying, Worldwide Vs National Licensing, Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unwired Planet International Ltd
Claimant
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd
First Defendant
Huawei Technologies (UK) Co. Ltd
Second Defendant
Unwired Planet LLC
Tenth Party
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and FRAND Licensing Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial on Non Technical (frand/competition Law/remedies) Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 What are the FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) terms for licensing Unwired Planet's SEPs to Huawei?
- 2 Is Unwired Planet entitled to insist on a worldwide licence or must it offer a UK-only licence?
- 3 Did Unwired Planet abuse a dominant position under Art 102 TFEU by its conduct (including bundling, excessive pricing, premature litigation)?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Unwired Planet's FRAND undertaking is enforceable, that only one set of FRAND terms exists for the circumstances, and that a worldwide licence is FRAND and Unwired Planet is entitled to insist on it. The appropriate FRAND rates were determined based on comparable licences and patent counting, with adjustments. Unwired Planet did not abuse a dominant position by its conduct, and an injunction should be granted unless Huawei enters into the settled worldwide FRAND licence. None of the parties' prior offers were FRAND.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant. Unwired Planet is entitled to an injunction unless Huawei enters into a worldwide FRAND licence on the terms settled by the court. None of the parties' prior offers were FRAND. No abuse of dominance was found.
Orders
- Unwired Planet to provide a worldwide FRAND licence to Huawei on the terms and rates set by the court.
- Injunction to be granted against Huawei for infringement of valid SEPs unless Huawei enters into the FRAND licence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment