Clarendon Dental Spa LLP & Anor v Aviva Insurance Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 267 (Comm) (13 February 2025)
The insolvency question in Zurich's statement of fact referred only to the Company and its current directors; Zurich waived disclosure of insolvency of other persons by the scope of its question. Allegations relating to failure to disclose liquidations of PDS, JHP, and BTB, and prior misrepresentation to Aviva, have no real prospect of success and are struck out.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 267 (Comm)
- Parties
- First Claimant: Clarendon Dental Spa LLP; Second Claimant: Clarendon Dental Spa (Leeds) Limited; First Defendant: Aviva Insurance Limited; Second Defendant: Zurich Insurance PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Interlocutory Applications (strike Out, Summary Judgment, Amendment)
- Outcome
- Strike out and refusal of amendment
- Legal Topics
- Fair Presentation of Risk, Duty of Disclosure, Insurance Act 2015, Policy Interpretation, Waiver by Insurer, Material Misrepresentation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clarendon Dental Spa LLP
First Claimant
Clarendon Dental Spa (Leeds) Limited
Second Claimant
Aviva Insurance Limited
First Defendant
Zurich Insurance PLC
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Interlocutory Applications (strike Out, Summary Judgment, Amendment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of insolvency questions in insurance statements of fact
- 2 Scope of duty of fair presentation under Insurance Act 2015
- 3 Whether insurer waived disclosure of insolvency of former partners/directors
Ratio Decidendi
The insolvency question in Zurich's statement of fact referred only to the Company and its current directors; Zurich waived disclosure of insolvency of other persons by the scope of its question. Allegations relating to failure to disclose liquidations of PDS, JHP, and BTB, and prior misrepresentation to Aviva, have no real prospect of success and are struck out.
Court Disposition
Strike out and refusal of amendment
Orders
- Permission to amend to introduce paragraph 44A and to amend paragraphs 60 and 61 refused.
- Paragraphs 44, 45, 60 and 61 of the Defence (and references thereto) struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment