Francis, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 718 (23 May 2014)
Detention under paragraph 2(1) and 2(3) of Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 1971 is lawful unless and until the Hardial Singh principles are breached; once removal is no longer possible within a reasonable time, statutory authority for detention ceases and continued detention constitutes false imprisonment.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Civ 718
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: David Francis; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Intervener: Bail for Immigration Detainees
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; damages for false imprisonment awarded for period from 1 June 2010 to 29 September 2011; appeal dismissed for earlier periods.
- Legal Topics
- False Imprisonment, Detention Pending Deportation, Hardial Singh Principles, Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Francis
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Bail for Immigration Detainees
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether detention under paragraph 2(1) and 2(3) of Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 1971 is vitiated by public law errors
- 2 Whether the Hardial Singh principles apply to mandatory detention under paragraph 2(1)
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State's failure to review detention renders it unlawful
Ratio Decidendi
Detention under paragraph 2(1) and 2(3) of Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 1971 is lawful unless and until the Hardial Singh principles are breached; once removal is no longer possible within a reasonable time, statutory authority for detention ceases and continued detention constitutes false imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; damages for false imprisonment awarded for period from 1 June 2010 to 29 September 2011; appeal dismissed for earlier periods.
Orders
- Damages for false imprisonment to be assessed for period 1 June 2010 to 29 September 2011
- No substantive relief for first and second periods of detention
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment