Wallett & Ors v Vickers [2018] EWHC 3088 (QB) (14 November 2018)
The claim is not barred by ex turpi causa as no criminal joint enterprise with the necessary mental element was established; damages are recoverable subject to a 60% reduction for contributory negligence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 3088
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Kelly Wallett; Respondent/defendant: Michael Vickers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment for claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Fatal Accidents Act 1976, Ex Turpi Causa, Contributory Negligence, Criminal Joint Enterprise, Dangerous Driving
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kelly Wallett
Appellant/claimant
Michael Vickers
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim is barred by ex turpi causa due to criminal joint enterprise
- 2 Whether dangerous driving constitutes turpitude barring recovery
- 3 Appropriate reduction for contributory negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The claim is not barred by ex turpi causa as no criminal joint enterprise with the necessary mental element was established; damages are recoverable subject to a 60% reduction for contributory negligence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment for claimant.
Orders
- Judgment for claimant for £86,000 (40% of agreed quantum)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment