Christopher Charles Fisher v Colin Laverock Dinwoodie

Christopher Charles Fisher v Colin Laverock Dinwoodie

A fiduciary relationship existed between Mr Fisher and Mr Dinwoodie based on their partnership and subsequent business dealings, imposing a duty of loyalty and good faith regarding shareholdings. Mr Fisher breached this duty by retaining legal title to shares and excluding Mr Dinwoodie. An express trust arose over the DA companies shares based on their agreement. The injunction restraining Mr Fisher from competing was unjustified as the fiduciary relationship had ended, and such restraint should not persist beyond the relationship's termination.

Parties
Defendant/appellant: Christopher Charles Fisher; Claimant/respondent: Colin Laverock Dinwoodie
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed except as to the injunction restraining competition, which is allowed.
Legal Topics
Fiduciary Duties, Express Trusts, Constructive Trusts, Partnership, Joint Venture, Injunctions
Equity Company Law Trusts Fiduciary Duties Express Trusts Constructive Trusts Partnership Joint Venture +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Charles Fisher

Defendant/appellant

Colin Laverock Dinwoodie

Claimant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a fiduciary relationship existed between Mr Fisher and Mr Dinwoodie regarding shares in BEM and DA companies
  2. 2 Whether an express trust or constructive trust arose over shares in DA companies
  3. 3 Whether the injunction restraining Mr Fisher from competing was justified

Ratio Decidendi

A fiduciary relationship existed between Mr Fisher and Mr Dinwoodie based on their partnership and subsequent business dealings, imposing a duty of loyalty and good faith regarding shareholdings. Mr Fisher breached this duty by retaining legal title to shares and excluding Mr Dinwoodie. An express trust arose over the DA companies shares based on their agreement. The injunction restraining Mr Fisher from competing was unjustified as the fiduciary relationship had ended, and such restraint should not persist beyond the relationship's termination.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed except as to the injunction restraining competition, which is allowed.

Orders

  • Declaration that Mr Dinwoodie has a beneficial interest in shares in BEM and DA companies
  • Setting aside the perpetual injunction restraining Mr Fisher from competing with the business of AML, QTV, BME or BEM