Chaston v SWP Group Plc [2002] EWCA Civ 1999 (20 December 2002)
The incurring and payment of D&T's fees by DRC constituted financial assistance within section 151 Companies Act 1985, as a matter of commercial reality, because it facilitated SWP's due diligence and acquisition of shares, relieving SWP and the vendors of costs. The assistance was 'for the purpose of' the acquisition, and bona fide director motivation or benefit to DRC did not remove the statutory prohibition. The judge erred in law in holding otherwise.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1999
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Robert Chaston; Defendant/appellant: SWP Group plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Financial Assistance for Acquisition of Shares, Directors' Fiduciary Duties, Section 151 Companies Act 1985, Section 152 Companies Act 1985, Section 153 Companies Act 1985
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Chaston
Claimant/respondent
SWP Group plc
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether incurring or payment of professional fees by DRC constituted unlawful financial assistance under section 151 Companies Act 1985 for the acquisition of shares in DRCH by SWP
- 2 Whether such assistance was given to the purchaser or vendor
- 3 Whether the assistance was 'for the purpose of' the acquisition within the meaning of the statute
Ratio Decidendi
The incurring and payment of D&T's fees by DRC constituted financial assistance within section 151 Companies Act 1985, as a matter of commercial reality, because it facilitated SWP's due diligence and acquisition of shares, relieving SWP and the vendors of costs. The assistance was 'for the purpose of' the acquisition, and bona fide director motivation or benefit to DRC did not remove the statutory prohibition. The judge erred in law in holding otherwise.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of the High Court set aside insofar as it dismissed SWP's Part 20 claim against Chaston for breach of fiduciary duty relating to unlawful financial assistance.
- Matter remitted for further proceedings consistent with the Court of Appeal's findings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment