DE v AB [2010] EWHC 3792 (Fam) (30 November 2010)

DE v AB [2010] EWHC 3792 (Fam) (30 November 2010)

The District Judge was justified in awarding a £250,000 housing fund for the child, but erred in awarding an additional £85,000 lump sum without sufficient analysis of its impact on the parties. The lump sum is reduced to the £40,000 already paid, as this leaves both parties with manageable financial positions and fulfills the statutory obligation to provide for the child.

Citation
[2010] EWHC 3792 (Fam)
Parties
Applicant/respondent: DE; Respondent/appellant: AB
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law Financial Provision for Child) / Judgment on Appeal From District Judge's Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; housing fund order upheld, lump sum reduced to £40,000 already paid, no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Financial Provision for Child, Schedule 1 Children Act 1989, Lump Sum Orders, Trust for Housing, Appeal Procedure, Costs
Family Law Financial Provision for Child Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 Lump Sum Orders Trust for Housing Appeal Procedure Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DE

Applicant/respondent

AB

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (family Law Financial Provision for Child) / Judgment on Appeal From District Judge's Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the District Judge's award of lump sum and housing fund under Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 was excessive and/or inadequately reasoned
  2. 2 Whether the District Judge failed to consider the overall impact and fairness of the award on the father
  3. 3 Whether the District Judge erred in calculation and allocation of lump sum for the mother's debts

Ratio Decidendi

The District Judge was justified in awarding a £250,000 housing fund for the child, but erred in awarding an additional £85,000 lump sum without sufficient analysis of its impact on the parties. The lump sum is reduced to the £40,000 already paid, as this leaves both parties with manageable financial positions and fulfills the statutory obligation to provide for the child.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; housing fund order upheld, lump sum reduced to £40,000 already paid, no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Father to provide £250,000 in trust for child's housing, with terms for investment and mortgage limits.
  • Lump sum payment to mother limited to £40,000 already paid; no further lump sum required.