DE v AB

DE v AB

The district judge was justified in awarding a £250,000 housing fund for the child, but the additional lump sum of £85,000 was not sufficiently analysed and was unfair as it left the father with little or no capital. The appeal was allowed in part, reducing the lump sum to reflect fairness to both parties while ensuring the child's needs are met.

Parties
Applicant/respondent: DE; Respondent/appellant: AB
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Family Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Financial Provision for Children, Schedule 1 Children Act 1989, Lump Sum Orders, Housing Provision for Child, Appeals Procedure
Family Law Child Law Financial Provision for Children Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 Lump Sum Orders Housing Provision for Child Appeals Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DE

Applicant/respondent

AB

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Family Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the district judge's financial provision order under Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 was excessive and/or inadequately reasoned
  2. 2 Whether the lump sum and housing fund awarded were fair and proportionate given the parties' financial circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The district judge was justified in awarding a £250,000 housing fund for the child, but the additional lump sum of £85,000 was not sufficiently analysed and was unfair as it left the father with little or no capital. The appeal was allowed in part, reducing the lump sum to reflect fairness to both parties while ensuring the child's needs are met.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Father to provide £250,000 housing fund for the child via trust, with terms for investment and mortgage limits as specified.
  • Lump sum award reduced; father required to pay £40,000 already paid, with no further lump sum.