Mendes v Hochtief (UK) Construction Ltd [2016] EWHC 976 (QB) (29 April 2016)
Where a case settles on the day of trial but before the trial commences, section B of Table 6B does not apply, and the costs fall to be assessed under section C, making the trial advocacy fee recoverable.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 976 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mr Bruno Manuel Dos Santos Mendes; Defendant/respondent: Hochtief (UK) Construction Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Costs
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Costs, CPR Part 45, Trial Advocacy Fee, Settlement on Day of Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Bruno Manuel Dos Santos Mendes
Claimant/appellant
Hochtief (UK) Construction Ltd
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Is a trial advocacy fee recoverable under the fixed costs scheme if a case settles on the day of trial but before the trial actually commences?
Ratio Decidendi
Where a case settles on the day of trial but before the trial commences, section B of Table 6B does not apply, and the costs fall to be assessed under section C, making the trial advocacy fee recoverable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Recorder's decision set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment