Santiago v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2023] EWCA Civ 838 (13 July 2023)
Interpreter's fees, when reasonably incurred to enable a party or witness to participate fully in proceedings and give their best evidence, are recoverable as a disbursement under CPR 45.29I(h), as this interpretation aligns with the overriding objective and ensures access to justice for vulnerable parties.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Civ 838
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Raphael De Lima Santiago; Respondent/defendant: Motor Insurers' Bureau
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Recoverable Costs, Disbursements, Interpreter Fees, Access to Justice, Vulnerable Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raphael De Lima Santiago
Appellant/claimant
Motor Insurers' Bureau
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interpreter's fees are recoverable as a disbursement under CPR 45.29I(h) in fixed costs cases where the claimant requires an interpreter at trial.
Ratio Decidendi
Interpreter's fees, when reasonably incurred to enable a party or witness to participate fully in proceedings and give their best evidence, are recoverable as a disbursement under CPR 45.29I(h), as this interpretation aligns with the overriding objective and ensures access to justice for vulnerable parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Interpreter's fees of £924 are recoverable as a disbursement under CPR 45.29I(h).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment