Ipswich Borough Council v Moore & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 1273 (25 July 2001)
The Ipswich Dock Act 1950 confers powers on the Port Authority to regulate and licence moorings, expressly making the Council's property rights subject to those statutory powers. The Council cannot require separate consent or charge for mooring licences where a licence has been granted by the Port Authority.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1273
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Ipswich Borough Council; Defendant/respondent: Derek Moore; Defendant/respondent: Alisdair Duke; Intervener: Crown Estates Commissioners; Intervener: Royal Yachting Association
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Chancery Division / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Foreshore Ownership, Mooring Licences, Statutory Interpretation, Port Authority Powers, Charter Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ipswich Borough Council
Claimant/appellant
Derek Moore
Defendant/respondent
Alisdair Duke
Defendant/respondent
Crown Estates Commissioners
Intervener
Royal Yachting Association
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Chancery Division / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ipswich Borough Council as owner of the river bed and foreshore can require consent and charge for mooring licences in addition to the Port Authority's licence
- 2 Whether statutory powers under the Ipswich Dock Act 1950 override the Council's property rights
- 3 Appropriate costs order given partial success on title
Ratio Decidendi
The Ipswich Dock Act 1950 confers powers on the Port Authority to regulate and licence moorings, expressly making the Council's property rights subject to those statutory powers. The Council cannot require separate consent or charge for mooring licences where a licence has been granted by the Port Authority.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Defendants awarded costs, including costs of respondent's notice and Crown Estates Commissioners' intervention, excluding costs of RYA application to intervene
- Application for leave to appeal to House of Lords refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment