Pat (Pensions) Ltd v Kamal & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1056 (5 July 2002)

Pat (Pensions) Ltd v Kamal & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1056 (5 July 2002)

Applicants were not entitled to set off repair costs against rent arrears because the landlord was under no obligation to pay for the repairs, there was no actionable misrepresentation, and no unjust enrichment occurred. The lease's express terms governed the parties' obligations. No procedural irregularity or breach of duty by the claimant's representatives was established.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 1056
Parties
Claimant/respondent: PAT (PENSIONS) LIMITED; Defendant/applicant: Soheir Kamal; Defendant/applicant: Peter Kempster
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Application for Permission to Appeal and Ancillary Reliefs
Outcome
Applications for permission to appeal and ancillary reliefs dismissed. Costs to respondent, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Legal Topics
Forfeiture of Lease, Relief From Forfeiture, Set Off Against Rent, Unjust Enrichment, Implied Terms, Misrepresentation, Possession Proceedings
Landlord and Tenant Property Law Civil Procedure Forfeiture of Lease Relief From Forfeiture Set Off Against Rent Unjust Enrichment Implied Terms +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PAT (PENSIONS) LIMITED

Claimant/respondent

Soheir Kamal

Defendant/applicant

Peter Kempster

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) / Application for Permission to Appeal and Ancillary Reliefs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether applicants are entitled to set off expenditure on repairs against rent arrears to prevent forfeiture
  2. 2 Whether landlord was under an obligation to carry out structural repairs
  3. 3 Whether there was actionable misrepresentation or unjust enrichment

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants were not entitled to set off repair costs against rent arrears because the landlord was under no obligation to pay for the repairs, there was no actionable misrepresentation, and no unjust enrichment occurred. The lease's express terms governed the parties' obligations. No procedural irregularity or breach of duty by the claimant's representatives was established.

Court Disposition

Applications for permission to appeal and ancillary reliefs dismissed. Costs to respondent, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.

Orders

  • If the June quarter-day rent is paid within seven days, execution of the possession order is stayed for eight weeks to allow payment of arrears and relief from forfeiture.
  • Any further applications to be made to the county court.