Gorgievski v Customs and Excise & Anor

Gorgievski v Customs and Excise & Anor

Compliance with the procedural rules was achieved; the claimant received notice of the hearing date, and any procedural irregularity did not render the proceedings a nullity. The district judge was entitled to reach the decision to order forfeiture.

Parties
Claimant: Antonio Gorgievski; First Defendant: H M Customs and Excise; Second Defendant: Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Magistrate's Forfeiture Order
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed
Legal Topics
Forfeiture of Cash, Drug Trafficking, Procedural Compliance, Magistrates' Court Procedure
Criminal Law Judicial Review Civil Procedure Forfeiture of Cash Drug Trafficking Procedural Compliance Magistrates' Court Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Antonio Gorgievski

Claimant

H M Customs and Excise

First Defendant

Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Magistrate's Forfeiture Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a valid application for forfeiture under section 43 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994
  2. 2 Whether procedural requirements under the Magistrates' Courts (Detention and Forfeiture of Drug Trafficking Cash) Rules 1991 were complied with
  3. 3 Whether any procedural irregularity rendered the proceedings a nullity

Ratio Decidendi

Compliance with the procedural rules was achieved; the claimant received notice of the hearing date, and any procedural irregularity did not render the proceedings a nullity. The district judge was entitled to reach the decision to order forfeiture.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed
  • Costs to be assessed in detail if not agreed, payable by the claimant to the first defendant