England v Muhith Choudhury & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 62 (14 January 2008)

England v Muhith Choudhury & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 62 (14 January 2008)

The judge found no agreement or estoppel arose from the correspondence or acceptance of cheques; the trial was conducted fairly, and there was no basis for allegations of bias or procedural unfairness.

Citation
[2008] EWCA Civ 62
Parties
Respondent/claimant: Douglas Roy England; Applicant/defendant: Muhith Choudhury & Others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 January 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Forfeiture of Lease, Arrears of Rent, Promissory Estoppel, Fair Trial, Judicial Bias
Landlord and Tenant Contract Law Civil Procedure Forfeiture of Lease Arrears of Rent Promissory Estoppel Fair Trial Judicial Bias

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Douglas Roy England

Respondent/claimant

Muhith Choudhury & Others

Applicant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the landlord was estopped from claiming arrears of rent due to correspondence and acceptance of cheques
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge conducted a fair trial and allowed proper cross-examination
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge was biased

Ratio Decidendi

The judge found no agreement or estoppel arose from the correspondence or acceptance of cheques; the trial was conducted fairly, and there was no basis for allegations of bias or procedural unfairness.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application refused
  • No stay of execution granted