Patel v Patel & Ors

Patel v Patel & Ors

The Defendants, by their own admissions, knowingly gave false evidence in probate proceedings, amounting to serious contempt of court. The First Defendant was the principal instigator, having forged the will and orchestrated the fraudulent claim. The Second, Third, and Fourth Defendants were secondary participants, influenced by the First Defendant but nonetheless responsible for their actions. The seriousness of the contempt, the need for deterrence, and the admissions and mitigation advanced determined the sentences imposed.

Parties
Claimant: Yashwant Dahyabhai Patel; First Defendant: Girish Dahyabhai Patel; Second Defendant: Jayshree Patel; Third Defendant: Ranjanbala Patel; Fourth Defendant: Nirja Jain
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 December 2017
Procedural Posture
Committal Application for Contempt of Court / Judgment on Liability and Sentencing
Outcome
Defendants found in contempt of court; sentences imposed.
Legal Topics
Forgery of Will, False Evidence, Committal for Contempt, Mitigation and Sentencing
Civil Procedure Probate Contempt of Court Forgery of Will False Evidence Committal for Contempt Mitigation and Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yashwant Dahyabhai Patel

Claimant

Girish Dahyabhai Patel

First Defendant

Jayshree Patel

Second Defendant

Ranjanbala Patel

Third Defendant

Nirja Jain

Fourth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Committal Application for Contempt of Court / Judgment on Liability and Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants committed contempt of court by knowingly giving false evidence in probate proceedings
  2. 2 Appropriate penalty for contempt of court in the circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendants, by their own admissions, knowingly gave false evidence in probate proceedings, amounting to serious contempt of court. The First Defendant was the principal instigator, having forged the will and orchestrated the fraudulent claim. The Second, Third, and Fourth Defendants were secondary participants, influenced by the First Defendant but nonetheless responsible for their actions. The seriousness of the contempt, the need for deterrence, and the admissions and mitigation advanced determined the sentences imposed.

Court Disposition

Defendants found in contempt of court; sentences imposed.

Orders

  • First Defendant (Girish Dahyabhai Patel) sentenced to 12 months' immediate imprisonment.
  • Second, Third, and Fourth Defendants (Jayshree Patel, Ranjanbala Patel, Nirja Jain) each sentenced to three months' imprisonment, suspended for 12 months on condition of no further contempt.