EMCOR Drake and Scull Ltd. v Sir Robert McaLpine Ltd.
No binding contract was concluded for EDS to carry out the whole of the M&E works for £34.25 million; work was performed pursuant to a series of limited orders, and the letter of 20 August 2001 did not constitute a binding agreement for the whole works.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Emcor Drake and Scull Limited; Defendant/appellant: Sir Robert McAlpine Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issues Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Formation of Contract, Preliminary Agreements, Construction Sub Contracts, Payment Terms, Repudiatory Breach, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emcor Drake and Scull Limited
Claimant/respondent
Sir Robert McAlpine Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issues Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether EDS was contractually bound to carry out the whole of the M&E works for £34.25 million
- 2 Whether a binding contract for the whole works was concluded between the parties
- 3 Whether the series of orders constituted separate contracts limited in value
Ratio Decidendi
No binding contract was concluded for EDS to carry out the whole of the M&E works for £34.25 million; work was performed pursuant to a series of limited orders, and the letter of 20 August 2001 did not constitute a binding agreement for the whole works.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant to pay Respondent’s costs in the sum of £38,000 within 14 days
- Application for permission to appeal order for costs refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment