Ella v Ella [2007] EWCA Civ 99 (17 January 2007)

Ella v Ella [2007] EWCA Civ 99 (17 January 2007)

The pre-nuptial agreement, specifying Israeli law and jurisdiction, is a major connecting factor making Israel clearly the more appropriate forum for the proceedings. The judge exercised her discretion correctly in granting a stay of the English proceedings, and there was no misdirection or error. The conditions imposed by the judge protect the wife's interests, including maintenance and legal costs, and preserve her ability to seek relief under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 if necessary. The appeal is dismissed.

Citation
[2007] EWCA Civ 99
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Ella; Defendant/respondent: Ella
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 January 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law Ancillary Relief/divorce) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (family Division)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal granted but substantive appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Forum Non Conveniens, Stay of Proceedings, Pre Nuptial Agreements, Ancillary Relief, Jurisdictional Disputes, Comity, Juridical Advantage

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ella

Claimant/applicant

Ella

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (family Law Ancillary Relief/divorce) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (family Division)

  1. 1 Whether English proceedings for divorce and ancillary relief should be stayed in favour of concurrent proceedings in Israel
  2. 2 The relevance and effect of a pre-nuptial agreement specifying Israeli law and jurisdiction
  3. 3 Whether the balance of fairness and convenience favours a stay of English proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The pre-nuptial agreement, specifying Israeli law and jurisdiction, is a major connecting factor making Israel clearly the more appropriate forum for the proceedings. The judge exercised her discretion correctly in granting a stay of the English proceedings, and there was no misdirection or error. The conditions imposed by the judge protect the wife's interests, including maintenance and legal costs, and preserve her ability to seek relief under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 if necessary. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal granted but substantive appeal refused.

Orders

  • Stay of English proceedings granted subject to undertakings and conditions protecting the wife's maintenance and legal costs.
  • Order not to be enforced without leave of the court and not before final determination in Israel of all matters relating to the marriage.