Transworld Payment Solutions U.K. Limited & Anor. v First Curaçao International Bank N.V. & Anor.
The English High Court is clearly and distinctly the appropriate forum for the claims, as the alleged fraud, damage, and key parties are most closely connected to England and Wales, and only the English court can determine all claims and bind all parties. The existence of parallel Curaçao proceedings, primarily for negative declarations and indemnities, does not outweigh these factors, nor does the risk of inconsistent judgments justify a stay. The assigned section 213 Insolvency Act claims are not validly assigned as the relevant companies entered liquidation before 1 October 2015, and the statutory change permitting assignment is not retrospective.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Transworld Payment Solutions U.K. Limited (In Liquidation); Claimant/respondent: Stephen John Hunt (as Liquidator of Transworld Payment Solutions U.K. Limited); Defendant/applicant: First Curaçao International Bank N.V.; Defendant/applicant: Johannes ('John') Christiaan Martinus Augustinus Maria Deuss
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/chancery) / Interlocutory Application—challenge to Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens, and Stay Pending Foreign Proceedings
- Outcome
- Defendants' applications to set aside service out and for a stay are dismissed except as to the assigned section 213 claims, which are struck out for want of a serious issue to be tried.
- Legal Topics
- Forum Non Conveniens, Jurisdictional Challenge, Assignment of Claims in Insolvency, Negative Declaratory Relief, Case Management Stay, Fraudulent Trading, Dishonest Assistance, Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Transworld Payment Solutions U.K. Limited (In Liquidation)
Claimant/respondent
Stephen John Hunt (as Liquidator of Transworld Payment Solutions U.K. Limited)
Claimant/respondent
First Curaçao International Bank N.V.
Defendant/applicant
Johannes ('John') Christiaan Martinus Augustinus Maria Deuss
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/chancery) / Interlocutory Application—challenge to Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens, and Stay Pending Foreign Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English High Court is the appropriate forum for the claims (forum non conveniens)
- 2 Whether proceedings should be stayed pending the outcome of related Curaçao proceedings
- 3 Whether assigned section 213 Insolvency Act 1986 claims are validly assigned and justiciable
Ratio Decidendi
The English High Court is clearly and distinctly the appropriate forum for the claims, as the alleged fraud, damage, and key parties are most closely connected to England and Wales, and only the English court can determine all claims and bind all parties. The existence of parallel Curaçao proceedings, primarily for negative declarations and indemnities, does not outweigh these factors, nor does the risk of inconsistent judgments justify a stay. The assigned section 213 Insolvency Act claims are not validly assigned as the relevant companies entered liquidation before 1 October 2015, and the statutory change permitting assignment is not retrospective.
Court Disposition
Defendants' applications to set aside service out and for a stay are dismissed except as to the assigned section 213 claims, which are struck out for want of a serious issue to be tried.
Orders
- Application to set aside service out of the jurisdiction dismissed except for assigned section 213 claims
- Application for a stay of English proceedings pending Curaçao proceedings dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment