Bonham- Carter & Ors v SITU Ventures Ltd

Bonham- Carter & Ors v SITU Ventures Ltd

The court found that neither Mrs Bonham-Carter nor Mrs Horn made fraudulent misrepresentations regarding HEL's market share to Mr Hammond or SVL. There was no credible evidence of such representations being made, nor that they were relied upon or induced the contract. The claimants are entitled to the outstanding purchase price, and the counterclaim for deceit fails.

Parties
Claimant: Jennifer Ann Bonham-Carter; Claimant: Antoinette Monique Horn; Claimant: Adam Spencer Horn; Defendant/counterclaimant: SITU Ventures Limited; Third Party/counterclaimant: Jeremy Guy Wilmot Hammond
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 December 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil (share Sale Agreement/fraudulent Misrepresentation) / Judgment After Full Trial
Outcome
Counterclaim for fraudulent misrepresentation dismissed; claim for outstanding purchase price succeeds.
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Share Sale Agreement, Damages, Inducement, Warranties, Remedies in Deceit
Contract Law Tort Law Company Law Fraudulent Misrepresentation Share Sale Agreement Damages Inducement Warranties +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jennifer Ann Bonham-Carter

Claimant

Antoinette Monique Horn

Claimant

Adam Spencer Horn

Claimant

SITU Ventures Limited

Defendant/counterclaimant

Jeremy Guy Wilmot Hammond

Third Party/counterclaimant

Procedural Posture

Civil (share Sale Agreement/fraudulent Misrepresentation) / Judgment After Full Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mrs Bonham-Carter and/or Mrs Horn made fraudulent misrepresentations regarding HEL's market share to induce the sale of shares to SVL and/or Mr Hammond.
  2. 2 Whether such representations were false, material, and induced SVL and/or Mr Hammond to enter the Agreement.
  3. 3 Whether the claimants are entitled to the outstanding purchase price and whether the counterclaimants are entitled to damages for deceit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that neither Mrs Bonham-Carter nor Mrs Horn made fraudulent misrepresentations regarding HEL's market share to Mr Hammond or SVL. There was no credible evidence of such representations being made, nor that they were relied upon or induced the contract. The claimants are entitled to the outstanding purchase price, and the counterclaim for deceit fails.

Court Disposition

Counterclaim for fraudulent misrepresentation dismissed; claim for outstanding purchase price succeeds.

Orders

  • Defendants to pay the outstanding balance of £157,882.72 under the Agreement to the claimants.
  • Counterclaim by SITU Ventures Limited and Jeremy Hammond dismissed.