A v Aziz & Ors [2007] EWHC 91 (QB) (29 January 2007)
The court found that Mrs. Amir invented and impersonated 'Mr. Aziz' to defraud the Claimant of substantial sums and confidential information, and subsequently threatened disclosure to pressure the Claimant. Mrs. Amir was held liable to account for and return the sums received, deliver up all confidential materials, and was permanently restrained from disclosing the Claimant's confidential information.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 91
- Parties
- Claimant: MRS A (Mariam Aziz); First Defendant: MR AZIZ; Second Defendant: METROPOLE COLLEGE LIMITED; Third Defendant: PLUTO ASSOCIATES LIMITED; Fourth Defendant: AL DAMIR LIMITED; Fifth Defendant: LAYLA RAHAMIM; Sixth Defendant: ABRAHAM SHALOM; Seventh Defendant: HEND SADEQ; Eighth Defendant: ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND; Ninth Defendant: BANK OF BEIRUT (UK) Limited; Tenth Defendant: AVIVA AMIR (Mrs. Amir / Mrs. Zino); Eleventh Defendant: AHMED EL-BERGAMI
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim (high Court, Queen's Bench Division) / Post Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant against the Tenth Defendant (Mrs. Amir).
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Breach of Confidence, Interim Relief, Freezing Orders, Contempt of Court, Damages, Delivery Up of Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MRS A (Mariam Aziz)
Claimant
MR AZIZ
First Defendant
METROPOLE COLLEGE LIMITED
Second Defendant
PLUTO ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Third Defendant
AL DAMIR LIMITED
Fourth Defendant
LAYLA RAHAMIM
Fifth Defendant
ABRAHAM SHALOM
Sixth Defendant
HEND SADEQ
Seventh Defendant
ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND
Eighth Defendant
BANK OF BEIRUT (UK) Limited
Ninth Defendant
AVIVA AMIR (Mrs. Amir / Mrs. Zino)
Tenth Defendant
AHMED EL-BERGAMI
Eleventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim (high Court, Queen's Bench Division) / Post Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs. Amir defrauded the Claimant by impersonating 'Mr. Aziz' and obtaining money and confidential information under false pretences
- 2 Whether Mrs. Amir is liable to return the sums paid and deliver up confidential materials
- 3 Whether Mrs. Amir breached interim court orders and confidentiality obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Mrs. Amir invented and impersonated 'Mr. Aziz' to defraud the Claimant of substantial sums and confidential information, and subsequently threatened disclosure to pressure the Claimant. Mrs. Amir was held liable to account for and return the sums received, deliver up all confidential materials, and was permanently restrained from disclosing the Claimant's confidential information.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant against the Tenth Defendant (Mrs. Amir).
Orders
- Mrs. Amir to account for and return all sums received from the Claimant.
- Mrs. Amir to deliver up all tapes and confidential materials belonging to the Claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment