Cirencester Friendly Society Ltd v Parkin [2015] EWHC 1750 (QB) (12 May 2015)
The defendant's fraudulent misrepresentations in his insurance application and claims entitled the claimant to avoid the contract ab initio, set aside the Ombudsman awards as unenforceable, and recover the sums paid under the void contract.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 1750 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Cirencester Friendly Society Limited; Defendant/appellant: Mr Christopher Parkin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (insurance/fraud) / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed. Judgment for claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Insurance Contract Avoidance, Financial Ombudsman Service Awards, Restitution of Payments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cirencester Friendly Society Limited
Claimant/respondent
Mr Christopher Parkin
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil (insurance/fraud) / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant fraudulently misrepresented material facts in his insurance application and claims
- 2 Whether the claimant was entitled to avoid the insurance contract ab initio
- 3 Whether the Financial Ombudsman Service awards were obtained by fraud and are unenforceable
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's fraudulent misrepresentations in his insurance application and claims entitled the claimant to avoid the contract ab initio, set aside the Ombudsman awards as unenforceable, and recover the sums paid under the void contract.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed. Judgment for claimant.
Orders
- Set aside the Financial Ombudsman Service awards of 10 September 2010 and 25 July 2012 as obtained by fraud and unenforceable.
- Declaration that the insurance contract was obtained by fraudulent misrepresentation and is void ab initio.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment