Star China Media Limited, R v The Office of Communications
The imposition of the £125,000 penalty on Star China was justified and proportionate to the legitimate aim of ensuring due impartiality in news broadcasting. The penalty was within Ofcom's margin of appreciation as a specialist regulator and did not infringe Article 10 ECHR rights, even after the revocation of Star China's licence, as it served as a general deterrent to other broadcasters.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Star China Media Limited; Defendant/respondent: The Office of Communications (Ofcom)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Broadcast Regulation, Due Impartiality, Proportionality, Sanctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Star China Media Limited
Claimant/appellant
The Office of Communications (Ofcom)
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ofcom acted lawfully in imposing a £125,000 penalty on Star China for breaches of due impartiality requirements under the Communications Act 2003 and the Broadcasting Code
- 2 Whether the penalty was a disproportionate interference with Star China's rights under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The imposition of the £125,000 penalty on Star China was justified and proportionate to the legitimate aim of ensuring due impartiality in news broadcasting. The penalty was within Ofcom's margin of appreciation as a specialist regulator and did not infringe Article 10 ECHR rights, even after the revocation of Star China's licence, as it served as a general deterrent to other broadcasters.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The penalty of £125,000 imposed by Ofcom stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment