D, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2004] EWCA Civ 1468 (11 October 2004)
The UK regulations lawfully implement the transitional derogations permitted by the Treaty of Accession, allowing discrimination in access to the labour market and related benefits for A8 nationals until 12 months' uninterrupted employment is achieved. The applicant, not being a 'worker' within the meaning of Article 7.2 prior to this period, cannot claim equal treatment. The registration requirement and fee are proportionate and justified.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1468
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: The Queen on the Application of 'D'; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal Against Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Movement for Workers, Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality, Transitional Provisions for EU Accession States, Access to Social Security Benefits, Worker Registration Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the Application of 'D'
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal Against Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether UK domestic regulations implementing transitional provisions for A8 nationals lawfully derogate from EU law on non-discrimination and access to benefits
- 2 Whether the requirement for worker registration and exclusion from certain benefits for less than 12 months' employment is unlawfully discriminatory
Ratio Decidendi
The UK regulations lawfully implement the transitional derogations permitted by the Treaty of Accession, allowing discrimination in access to the labour market and related benefits for A8 nationals until 12 months' uninterrupted employment is achieved. The applicant, not being a 'worker' within the meaning of Article 7.2 prior to this period, cannot claim equal treatment. The registration requirement and fee are proportionate and justified.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Permission to apply for judicial review refused
- Costs awarded to respondent subject to detailed assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment