D, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
The domestic regulations of 2004 constitute a permissible derogation under the Treaty of Accession and Regulation 1612/68, allowing discrimination against accession state nationals in access to the labour market and related benefits during the transitional period. The applicant was not entitled to equal treatment as a worker or jobseeker until meeting the 12-month employment requirement. The registration requirement and fee are proportionate and lawful within the derogation.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: The Queen on the Application of 'D'; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Movement for Workers, Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality, Transitional Provisions for EU Accession States, Access to Social Benefits, Worker Registration Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the Application of 'D'
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2004 domestic regulations unlawfully discriminate against nationals of accession states contrary to EU law
- 2 Whether the derogations and transitional measures under the Treaty of Accession and Regulation 1612/68 permit the impugned discrimination
- 3 Whether the applicant, as a worker or jobseeker, is entitled to equal access to social benefits
Ratio Decidendi
The domestic regulations of 2004 constitute a permissible derogation under the Treaty of Accession and Regulation 1612/68, allowing discrimination against accession state nationals in access to the labour market and related benefits during the transitional period. The applicant was not entitled to equal treatment as a worker or jobseeker until meeting the 12-month employment requirement. The registration requirement and fee are proportionate and lawful within the derogation.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application for permission to apply for judicial review refused
- Costs to be subject to detailed assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment