RBS Invoice Finance Ltd v Karia & Ors [2008] EWHC 1238 (QB) (12 May 2008)
Although the claimant had a good arguable case for fraud and breach of trust, there was insufficient evidence of a real risk of dissipation of assets by the defendants; therefore, the freezing order could not be continued.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 1238 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: RBS Invoice Finance Limited; First Defendant: Mayus Karia; Second Defendant: RAM Recycling Limited; Third Defendant: Grittco Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application (freezing Order) / Application to Continue/discharge Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Freezing order discharged
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunctions, Fraud, Breach of Trust, Conversion, Interlocutory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RBS Invoice Finance Limited
Claimant
Mayus Karia
First Defendant
RAM Recycling Limited
Second Defendant
Grittco Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application (freezing Order) / Application to Continue/discharge Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant has a good arguable case for fraud and breach of trust
- 2 Whether there is a real risk of dissipation of assets justifying continuation of a freezing order
Ratio Decidendi
Although the claimant had a good arguable case for fraud and breach of trust, there was insufficient evidence of a real risk of dissipation of assets by the defendants; therefore, the freezing order could not be continued.
Court Disposition
Freezing order discharged
Orders
- The freezing order is discharged in its entirety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment