RBS Invoice Finance Ltd v Karia & Ors [2008] EWHC 1238 (QB) (12 May 2008)

RBS Invoice Finance Ltd v Karia & Ors [2008] EWHC 1238 (QB) (12 May 2008)

Although the claimant established a good arguable case for fraud and breach of trust, there was insufficient evidence of a real risk of dissipation of assets by the defendants; therefore, the freezing order could not be continued.

Citation
[2008] EWHC 1238
Parties
Claimant: RBS Invoice Finance Limited; First Defendant: Mayus Karia; Second Defendant: RAM Recycling Limited; Third Defendant: Grittco Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application (freezing Order) / Application to Continue/discharge Interim Injunction
Outcome
Freezing order discharged
Legal Topics
Freezing Injunctions, Fraud, Breach of Trust, Factoring Agreements, Asset Dissipation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

RBS Invoice Finance Limited

Claimant

Mayus Karia

First Defendant

RAM Recycling Limited

Second Defendant

Grittco Limited

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application (freezing Order) / Application to Continue/discharge Interim Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the claimant has a good arguable case for fraud and breach of trust
  2. 2 Whether there is a real risk of dissipation of assets justifying continuation of a freezing order

Ratio Decidendi

Although the claimant established a good arguable case for fraud and breach of trust, there was insufficient evidence of a real risk of dissipation of assets by the defendants; therefore, the freezing order could not be continued.

Court Disposition

Freezing order discharged

Orders

  • The freezing order is discharged in its entirety.