LTE Scientific Ltd. v Thomas & Anor [2005] EWCA Civ 1177 (27 July 2005)
The facts did not meet the high threshold of urgency required for an ex parte freezing order. The applicant had already put the respondents on notice, and there was no evidence of imminent dissipation of assets that could not be addressed by an application on notice.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1177
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: LTE Scientific Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Mr Thomas; Defendant/respondent: Mrs Thomas
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (court of Appeal) Against Refusal of Ex Parte Freezing Order
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunctions, Ex Parte Applications, Restrictive Covenants, Urgency in Interim Relief, Breach of Contract, Contempt of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LTE Scientific Ltd
Claimant/appellant
Mr Thomas
Defendant/respondent
Mrs Thomas
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (court of Appeal) Against Refusal of Ex Parte Freezing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the urgency justified granting a freezing order without notice
- 2 Whether the risk of dissipation of assets was immediate and exceptional
Ratio Decidendi
The facts did not meet the high threshold of urgency required for an ex parte freezing order. The applicant had already put the respondents on notice, and there was no evidence of imminent dissipation of assets that could not be addressed by an application on notice.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment