National Bank Trust v Yurov [2020] EWHC 757 (Comm) (27 February 2020)
The court granted post-judgment worldwide freezing orders against the defendants, released the Bank from undertakings restricting use of information for enforcement in Switzerland and other jurisdictions, and limited living and legal expenses exceptions to cases where defendants demonstrated no other assets. The court refused Bank Winter's application for a disclaimer, finding it unnecessary, and declined to make a costs order against Bank Winter. The court also clarified the wording of declaratory relief and hearing orders, and released the Bank from cross-undertakings in damages.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 757 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: National Bank Trust; First Defendant: Ilya Yurov; Second Defendant: Sergey Belyaev; Third Defendant: Nikolay Fetisov; Fourth Defendant: Nataliya Yurova; Fifth Defendant: Irina Belyaeva; Sixth Defendant: Elena Pischulina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Post Judgment Consequential Hearing
- Outcome
- Post-judgment worldwide freezing orders granted; Bank released from undertakings; declaratory relief and asset disclosure ordered; limited provision for living/legal expenses; no costs order against Bank Winter; cross-undertakings in damages released.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunctions, Asset Disclosure, Enforcement of Judgments, Cross Undertakings in Damages, Living and Legal Expenses Under Freezing Orders, Trusts, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Bank Trust
Claimant
Ilya Yurov
First Defendant
Sergey Belyaev
Second Defendant
Nikolay Fetisov
Third Defendant
Nataliya Yurova
Fourth Defendant
Irina Belyaeva
Fifth Defendant
Elena Pischulina
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Post Judgment Consequential Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant post-judgment worldwide freezing order and its scope
- 2 Whether to release claimant from undertaking restricting use of information obtained under freezing order
- 3 Entitlement to living and legal expenses under post-judgment freezing order
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted post-judgment worldwide freezing orders against the defendants, released the Bank from undertakings restricting use of information for enforcement in Switzerland and other jurisdictions, and limited living and legal expenses exceptions to cases where defendants demonstrated no other assets. The court refused Bank Winter's application for a disclaimer, finding it unnecessary, and declined to make a costs order against Bank Winter. The court also clarified the wording of declaratory relief and hearing orders, and released the Bank from cross-undertakings in damages.
Court Disposition
Post-judgment worldwide freezing orders granted; Bank released from undertakings; declaratory relief and asset disclosure ordered; limited provision for living/legal expenses; no costs order against Bank Winter; cross-undertakings in damages released.
Orders
- Post-judgment worldwide freezing order against defendants (with limited scope for Sixth Defendant)
- Release of Bank from undertaking restricting use of information for enforcement in Switzerland and other jurisdictions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment