CTI Group Inc v Transclear SA
The tribunal erred in law in finding that the contracts were frustrated or subject to an implied term discharging the parties upon supplier refusal. The risk of supplier failure was on the sellers, who made an unqualified promise to supply, and no implied term could override this allocation of risk.
- Parties
- Claimant/buyers: CTI Group Inc; Defendant/sellers: Transclear SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Award
- Outcome
- Buyers' appeal allowed; tribunal's findings set aside
- Legal Topics
- Frustration of Contract, Implied Terms, Sale of Goods, Risk Allocation in Supply Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CTI Group Inc
Claimant/buyers
Transclear SA
Defendant/sellers
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contracts were frustrated by supplier refusal due to third-party intervention
- 2 Whether there was an implied term discharging the parties if suppliers refused to supply due to intended use or destination
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal erred in law in finding that the contracts were frustrated or subject to an implied term discharging the parties upon supplier refusal. The risk of supplier failure was on the sellers, who made an unqualified promise to supply, and no implied term could override this allocation of risk.
Court Disposition
Buyers' appeal allowed; tribunal's findings set aside
Orders
- Tribunal's findings of frustration and implied term set aside
- Court to hear submissions on consequential orders, including referral of damages issues to the tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment