Lloyds Banking Group Pensions Trustees Ltd v Lloyds Bank Plc & Ors
The trustee is legally obliged to equalise benefits for the effect of unequal GMPs between men and women for service between 17 May 1990 and 5 April 1997. The obligation arises under Article 157 TFEU and section 67 Equality Act 2010. The only legally permissible methods are those that achieve equalisation with minimum interference to the rights of employers and beneficiaries; method C2 (year-by-year comparison with interest at 1% over base rate) is required. Back-payments must be made for all underpayments, subject only to any valid scheme forfeiture rules, and are not subject to a statutory limitation period. Interest is payable at 1% over base rate, simple interest. The statutory GMP...
- Parties
- Claimant: Lloyds Banking Group Pensions Trustees Limited; First Defendant: Lloyds Bank PLC; Second Defendant: HBOS PLC; Third Defendant: Angela Sharp; Fourth Defendant: Judith Cain; Fifth Defendant: Susan Dixon; Sixth Defendant: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Seventh Defendant: Her Majesty’s Treasury
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (pensions/trusts, Part 8 Claim) / Judgment After Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; declaration of obligation to equalise benefits for the effect of unequal GMPs; directions as to method and period for back-payments and interest.
- Legal Topics
- GMP Equalisation, Sex Discrimination in Occupational Pensions, Trustee Powers and Duties, Limitation Periods in Pension Claims, Interest on Arrears, Principle of Minimum Interference, Implementation of EU Law in Domestic Schemes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lloyds Banking Group Pensions Trustees Limited
Claimant
Lloyds Bank PLC
First Defendant
HBOS PLC
Second Defendant
Angela Sharp
Third Defendant
Judith Cain
Fourth Defendant
Susan Dixon
Fifth Defendant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Sixth Defendant
Her Majesty’s Treasury
Seventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (pensions/trusts, Part 8 Claim) / Judgment After Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Is there a legal obligation to equalise benefits for the effect of unequal GMPs between men and women in occupational pension schemes?
- 2 What method(s) of equalisation are legally permissible or required?
- 3 What is the period for which back-payments must be made and is there a limitation period?
Ratio Decidendi
The trustee is legally obliged to equalise benefits for the effect of unequal GMPs between men and women for service between 17 May 1990 and 5 April 1997. The obligation arises under Article 157 TFEU and section 67 Equality Act 2010. The only legally permissible methods are those that achieve equalisation with minimum interference to the rights of employers and beneficiaries; method C2 (year-by-year comparison with interest at 1% over base rate) is required. Back-payments must be made for all underpayments, subject only to any valid scheme forfeiture rules, and are not subject to a statutory limitation period. Interest is payable at 1% over base rate, simple interest. The statutory GMP...
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; declaration of obligation to equalise benefits for the effect of unequal GMPs; directions as to method and period for back-payments and interest.
Orders
- Trustee to amend the Schemes to equalise benefits for the effect of unequal GMPs for service between 17 May 1990 and 5 April 1997.
- Trustee to adopt method C2 (year-by-year comparison with interest at 1% over base rate, simple interest) for equalisation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment