SG & R Valuation Service Co v Boudrais & Ors [2008] EWHC 1340 (QB) (12 May 2008)
Employees with a right to work may be kept away from work if their conduct constitutes serious breach of contractual or fiduciary duties, demonstrating lack of readiness and willingness to work; in such circumstances, employer's action does not amount to repudiatory breach. No express or implied contractual power...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 1340
- Parties
- Claimant: SG & R Valuation Service Co; First Defendant: Dominic Boudrais; Second Defendant: Karen Smith; Third Defendant: Mark Finney; Fourth Defendant: Collier CRE plc; Fifth Defendant: Related company of Collier CRE plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Application for Injunctive Relief / Return Date Hearing Following Without Notice Application
- Outcome
- Interim relief granted; first and second defendants required to remain away from work during notice period; application for destruction order against fourth and fifth defendants refused.
- Legal Topics
- Garden Leave, Right to Work, Suspension, Confidential Information, Fiduciary Duties, Springboard Injunctions, Balance of Convenience
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SG & R Valuation Service Co
Claimant
Dominic Boudrais
First Defendant
Karen Smith
Second Defendant
Mark Finney
Third Defendant
Collier CRE plc
Fourth Defendant
Related company of Collier CRE plc
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interim Application for Injunctive Relief / Return Date Hearing Following Without Notice Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an employer can place employees on garden leave absent an express contractual provision
- 2 Whether suspension powers in an employee manual are incorporated into employment contracts
- 3 Whether employees have a right to work and its qualifications
Ratio Decidendi
Employees with a right to work may be kept away from work if their conduct constitutes serious breach of contractual or fiduciary duties, demonstrating lack of readiness and willingness to work; in such circumstances, employer's action does not amount to repudiatory breach. No express or implied contractual power for garden leave existed, but the defendants' misconduct justified withholding work during notice period. Springboard relief was not justified as confidential information had been returned or sterilised and no evidence of misuse existed.
Court Disposition
Interim relief granted; first and second defendants required to remain away from work during notice period; application for destruction order against fourth and fifth defendants refused.
Orders
- First and second defendants to remain at home (garden leave) until expiry of notice period.
- Defendants to continue to be paid salary and protected by cross-undertakings as to damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment