SG & R Valuation Service Co v Boudrais & Ors [2008] EWHC 1340 (QB) (12 May 2008)
Absent an express contractual provision, an employer cannot place employees on garden leave unless the employees' conduct constitutes a serious breach of duty such that they are not ready and willing to work; in such circumstances, the employer is not in repudiatory breach by requiring them to remain at home during...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 1340 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: SG & R Valuation Service Co; First Defendant: Dominic Boudrais; Second Defendant: Karen Smith; Third Defendant: Mark Finney; Fourth Defendant: Collier CRE plc; Fifth Defendant: Related company of Collier CRE plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Application for Injunctive Relief in Employment Dispute / Return Date Hearing on Interim Relief
- Outcome
- Interim relief granted in favour of the claimant; employees required to remain away from work during notice period; application for destruction order against fourth and fifth defendants refused.
- Legal Topics
- Garden Leave, Right to Work, Suspension of Employees, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Confidential Information, Springboard Injunctions, Notice Periods, Restrictive Covenants
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SG & R Valuation Service Co
Claimant
Dominic Boudrais
First Defendant
Karen Smith
Second Defendant
Mark Finney
Third Defendant
Collier CRE plc
Fourth Defendant
Related company of Collier CRE plc
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interim Application for Injunctive Relief in Employment Dispute / Return Date Hearing on Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an employer can place employees on garden leave absent an express contractual provision
- 2 Whether the employees have a right to work during the notice period
- 3 Whether the conduct of the employees constituted a repudiatory breach of contract
Ratio Decidendi
Absent an express contractual provision, an employer cannot place employees on garden leave unless the employees' conduct constitutes a serious breach of duty such that they are not ready and willing to work; in such circumstances, the employer is not in repudiatory breach by requiring them to remain at home during the notice period. The employees' conduct in this case justified the employer's actions, and interim relief was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Interim relief granted in favour of the claimant; employees required to remain away from work during notice period; application for destruction order against fourth and fifth defendants refused.
Orders
- First and second defendants to remain away from work until expiry of notice period; undertakings to pay salary and not to solicit employees continue.
- Application for destruction of confidential information by fourth and fifth defendants refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment