Summers v Bundy [2016] EWCA Civ 126 (11 February 2016)
A legally aided claimant is entitled as of right to the 10% uplift in general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity, and the trial judge has no discretion to withhold the uplift; Simmons v Castle is binding and admits only the section 44(6) exception.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 126
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Summers; Defendant/respondent: Bundy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Clinical Negligence Claim (personal Injury) / Appeal From Assessment of Damages After Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- General Damages Uplift, Legal Aid and Damages, Simmons V Castle Uplift, Discretion in Damages Awards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Summers
Claimant/appellant
Bundy
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Clinical Negligence Claim (personal Injury) / Appeal From Assessment of Damages After Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a legally aided claimant is entitled as of right to the 10% uplift in general damages established by Simmons v Castle
- 2 Whether the trial judge has discretion to withhold the 10% uplift from legally aided claimants
Ratio Decidendi
A legally aided claimant is entitled as of right to the 10% uplift in general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity, and the trial judge has no discretion to withhold the uplift; Simmons v Castle is binding and admits only the section 44(6) exception.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Award of general damages increased by 10% uplift to £30,250 (from £27,500)
- Total judgment sum (including interest and other damages) increased to £46,759.30
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment