Philipp Stampfer v Avon Ground Rents Ltd
The preparation and service of a section 166 notice is not the same as collecting rent; it is a prerequisite step, not part of the collection process. The lease does not expressly or impliedly permit the landlord to charge a fee for serving section 166 notices as part of 'attending to the collection of rents.'
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent to Appeal: Philipp Stampfer; Respondent/appellant: Avon Ground Rents Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From Upper Tribunal (lands Chamber) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ground Rent Collection, Lease Interpretation, Administration Charges, Section 166 Notices, Service Charges
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philipp Stampfer
Applicant/respondent to Appeal
Avon Ground Rents Ltd
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From Upper Tribunal (lands Chamber) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a landlord can charge a fee for serving a section 166 notice under the lease as part of 'attending to the collection of rents'
- 2 Proper construction of lease provisions regarding deemed landlord's expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The preparation and service of a section 166 notice is not the same as collecting rent; it is a prerequisite step, not part of the collection process. The lease does not expressly or impliedly permit the landlord to charge a fee for serving section 166 notices as part of 'attending to the collection of rents.'
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by Avon Ground Rents Ltd is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment