AB & Ors v British Coal Corporation & Ors [2006] EWCA Civ 1357 (19 October 2006)
The supervising judge has jurisdiction to order compensatory financial awards (including interest or damages) for claims stalled under the CHA, as part of the court's case management powers in this coordinated litigation. The CHA's reference to 'costs' must be construed in accordance with the law at the time of assessment, permitting the recovery of success fees where costs are assessed, subject to the contractual qualification that unsuccessful claimants bear their own costs.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1357
- Parties
- Claimants: AB & ORS; Defendants: BRITISH COAL CORPORATION (Department of Trade and Industry) & ORS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From High Court (supervising Judge)
- Outcome
- Claimants' appeal on jurisdiction allowed but substantive appeal dismissed; Defendants' appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Group Litigation, Claims Handling Agreements, Interest on Damages, Success Fees in Costs, Case Management Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB & ORS
Claimants
BRITISH COAL CORPORATION (Department of Trade and Industry) & ORS
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From High Court (supervising Judge)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the supervising judge have jurisdiction to order financial compensation (interest or damages) for claims stalled under the Claims Handling Agreement (CHA)?
- 2 Are claimants' solicitors entitled to recover a success fee from the defendants under the CHA when costs are assessed, following changes in the law?
Ratio Decidendi
The supervising judge has jurisdiction to order compensatory financial awards (including interest or damages) for claims stalled under the CHA, as part of the court's case management powers in this coordinated litigation. The CHA's reference to 'costs' must be construed in accordance with the law at the time of assessment, permitting the recovery of success fees where costs are assessed, subject to the contractual qualification that unsuccessful claimants bear their own costs.
Court Disposition
Claimants' appeal on jurisdiction allowed but substantive appeal dismissed; Defendants' appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that the supervising judge has power to order compensatory payments for stalled claims under the CHA.
- No general order for payment of interest at judgment rate; parties to attempt agreement on procedure for stalled claims.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment