Taylor v Nugent Care Society [2004] EWCA Civ 51 (19 January 2004)
Striking out the claimant's claim was a disproportionate response; the court should instead impose a stay and allow for directions to be considered by the judge managing the group action, as the claimant had not disobeyed any court order and alternative management steps were available.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 51
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Mark Taylor (Formerly Mark Housley); Respondent/defendant: Nugent Care Society (Formerly Catholic Social Services, Liverpool)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Group Litigation Order, Abuse of Process, Case Management, Limitation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Taylor (Formerly Mark Housley)
Appellant/claimant
Nugent Care Society (Formerly Catholic Social Services, Liverpool)
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is an abuse of process for a claimant refused permission to join a group litigation order (GLO) out of time to proceed with an individual claim
- 2 Whether striking out the claim is a proportionate response
Ratio Decidendi
Striking out the claimant's claim was a disproportionate response; the court should instead impose a stay and allow for directions to be considered by the judge managing the group action, as the claimant had not disobeyed any court order and alternative management steps were available.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Claim restored
- Stay imposed pending directions by Holland J
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment