AXA Sun Life PLC & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue & Anor [2024] EWCA Civ 1430 (27 November 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that the limitation issue must be determined in accordance with the law as now understood following FII SC2, not by reference to prior test case orders; the set-off issue, though determined as a GLO issue in Prudential, should not bind other group register claims due to exceptional circumstances and subsequent legal developments, so the appeal on that issue is dismissed; HMRC's appeal on the pleading issue is allowed as AXAIUK had not properly pleaded a restitution claim for unused DTR credits.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Civ 1430
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: AXA Sun Life plc; Claimant/appellant: AXA Equity & Law Assurance Society plc; Claimant/appellant: Sun Life Assurance Society plc; Claimant/appellant: Sun Life Unit Assurance Limited; Claimant/appellant: AXA General Insurance Limited; Claimant/appellant: AXA Insurance UK plc; Claimant/appellant: AXA Insurance plc; Claimant/appellant: Sun Life Pensions Management Limited; Claimant/appellant: Winterthur UK Limited; Defendant/respondent: Commissioners of Inland Revenue; Defendant/respondent: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (business and Property Courts, Revenue List) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Claimants' appeals on the Limitation and Set-off issues dismissed; HMRC's appeal on the Pleading issue allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Group Litigation Orders, Limitation Periods, Restitution for Unlawfully Levied Tax, Compound Interest, Issue Estoppel, Advance Corporation Tax, Double Tax Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AXA Sun Life plc
Claimant/appellant
AXA Equity & Law Assurance Society plc
Claimant/appellant
Sun Life Assurance Society plc
Claimant/appellant
Sun Life Unit Assurance Limited
Claimant/appellant
AXA General Insurance Limited
Claimant/appellant
AXA Insurance UK plc
Claimant/appellant
AXA Insurance plc
Claimant/appellant
Sun Life Pensions Management Limited
Claimant/appellant
Winterthur UK Limited
Claimant/appellant
Commissioners of Inland Revenue
Defendant/respondent
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue & Customs
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (business and Property Courts, Revenue List) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimants' claims were within the limitation period by reason of prior orders and judgments or should be determined under current law post-FII SC2
- 2 Whether GREA is entitled to a restitutionary claim for unlawful ACT utilised against lawful tax before the claim, in line with the Prudential concession
- 3 Whether AXAIUK pleaded a valid restitution claim for inability to offset unused DTR credits, and how such claim should be assessed
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the limitation issue must be determined in accordance with the law as now understood following FII SC2, not by reference to prior test case orders; the set-off issue, though determined as a GLO issue in Prudential, should not bind other group register claims due to exceptional circumstances and subsequent legal developments, so the appeal on that issue is dismissed; HMRC's appeal on the pleading issue is allowed as AXAIUK had not properly pleaded a restitution claim for unused DTR credits.
Court Disposition
Claimants' appeals on the Limitation and Set-off issues dismissed; HMRC's appeal on the Pleading issue allowed.
Orders
- Limitation issue determined in favour of HMRC; claims not conclusively within limitation period by prior orders.
- Set-off issue: Court orders otherwise under CPR 19.23; GLO issue decision in Prudential not binding for other group claims; GREA confined to statutory remedy under FA 2019 s.85.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment