Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc
Successive claims for cross-border group relief are permissible within statutory time limits, provided earlier claims are withdrawn if later claims satisfy the 'no possibilities' test. The correct method for calculating losses is to convert unutilised local losses to UK principles (Method E). The principle of effectiveness does not require extension of time limits for pay and file claims where no right existed at the time of claim.
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs; Appellant/respondent: Marks and Spencer plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals of HMRC on issues 2 and 5 dismissed; appeal of M&S on issue 4 dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Group Relief, Cross Border Loss Relief, Corporation Tax, Freedom of Establishment, Time Limits for Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Appellant/respondent
Marks and Spencer plc
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sequential/cumulative claims for cross-border group relief can be made for the same losses within statutory time limits
- 2 Whether the principle of effectiveness requires allowance of fresh or sequential claims after ECJ clarification
- 3 What is the correct method for calculating losses available for cross-border group relief
Ratio Decidendi
Successive claims for cross-border group relief are permissible within statutory time limits, provided earlier claims are withdrawn if later claims satisfy the 'no possibilities' test. The correct method for calculating losses is to convert unutilised local losses to UK principles (Method E). The principle of effectiveness does not require extension of time limits for pay and file claims where no right existed at the time of claim.
Court Disposition
Appeals of HMRC on issues 2 and 5 dismissed; appeal of M&S on issue 4 dismissed.
Orders
- M&S is entitled to advance all its self-assessment claims for group relief within statutory time limits.
- Relevant pay and file claims are time-barred and cannot be pursued.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment