Lam v National Federation Of Small Businesses [2002] EWCA Civ 212 (28 January 2002)
The applicant's claim is arguable because the legal structure of the Federation's insurance arrangements raises unresolved issues about agency and trusteeship, as highlighted in Swain v The Law Society. The matter is not unarguable and should proceed to a full appeal.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 212
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: LAM; Defendant/respondent: National Federation of Small Businesses
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Group Insurance Schemes, Agency, Trusteeship, Contractual Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAM
Claimant/applicant
National Federation of Small Businesses
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federation was contractually obliged to provide direct support to the applicant or merely to arrange insurance cover
- 2 Whether a contract existed between the applicant and the Federation for unconditional support up to £35,000 or £50,000
- 3 Whether the Federation acted as agent or trustee in arranging insurance for members
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's claim is arguable because the legal structure of the Federation's insurance arrangements raises unresolved issues about agency and trusteeship, as highlighted in Swain v The Law Society. The matter is not unarguable and should proceed to a full appeal.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Application allowed
- Appeal to be listed before two Lord Justices, one of whom may be a High Court judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment