Habib Bank Ltd. v Dawood [2004] EWCA Civ 1346 (07 October 2004)
The judge erred in law and discretion by refusing permission to amend the claim to include compound contractual interest; such amendment should be allowed as there was no real prejudice to the defendant and the real dispute should be adjudicated.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1346
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Habib Bank Limited; Defendant/respondent: Mohammed Ali Dawood
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee Liability, Amendment of Pleadings, Contractual Interest, Compound Interest, Summary Judgment, Strike Out for Want of Prosecution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Habib Bank Limited
Claimant/appellant
Mohammed Ali Dawood
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant bank could amend its claim to include compound contractual interest after judgment on liability
- 2 Whether the refusal to permit amendment was correct in law and discretion
- 3 Whether the claim for compound interest in a second action was barred
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in law and discretion by refusing permission to amend the claim to include compound contractual interest; such amendment should be allowed as there was no real prejudice to the defendant and the real dispute should be adjudicated.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to amend the claim to include compound interest granted
- Judgment for compound interest in the sum of £147,607.51
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment