Moat Financial Services v Wilkinson [2005] EWCA Civ 1253 (11 October 2005)
By signing the 1999 letter, Mr and Mrs Wilkinson agreed to be bound by the varied facility letter, which included providing a guarantee for the increased loan amount of £250,000. The 1999 letter, read together with the facility letter and the 1997 guarantee, satisfied the requirements of the Statute of Frauds 1677. Their liability as guarantors was therefore increased to £250,000.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1253
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Moat Financial Services; Respondent/defendant: David Wilkinson; Respondent/defendant: Barbara Wilkinson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Bury County Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee Liability, Variation of Contract, Statute of Frauds, Construction of Commercial Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moat Financial Services
Applicant/claimant
David Wilkinson
Respondent/defendant
Barbara Wilkinson
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Bury County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the liability of Mr and Mrs Wilkinson as guarantors was capped at £100,000 or £250,000
- 2 Whether the guarantee was continuing or specific
- 3 Whether the 1999 letter satisfied the Statute of Frauds 1677
Ratio Decidendi
By signing the 1999 letter, Mr and Mrs Wilkinson agreed to be bound by the varied facility letter, which included providing a guarantee for the increased loan amount of £250,000. The 1999 letter, read together with the facility letter and the 1997 guarantee, satisfied the requirements of the Statute of Frauds 1677. Their liability as guarantors was therefore increased to £250,000.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Matter remitted to Bury County Court to determine the amount of interest if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment