Wittmann (UK) Ltd v Willdav Engineering SA
The guarantee executed by Willdav Engineering S.A. remained effective to cover Automold’s residual liability for the purchase price of goods supplied by Wittmann (UK) Limited, notwithstanding the financing arrangements with third-party finance companies. The original obligation was not wholly discharged but merely reduced by the sums paid by the finance companies, and the guarantee continued to apply to the outstanding balance. The guarantee’s terms and the parties’ knowledge and intentions supported this construction. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Wittmann (UK) Limited; Defendant/appellant: Willdav Engineering S.A.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (mercantile List) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee Liability, Variation of Contract, Discharge of Surety, Financing Arrangements, Statute of Frauds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wittmann (UK) Limited
Claimant/respondent
Willdav Engineering S.A.
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (mercantile List) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the guarantee executed by Willdav Engineering S.A. extended to Automold’s residual liability after financing arrangements with third-party finance companies altered the original contract structure.
- 2 Whether the original contract was discharged and replaced by new contracts outside the scope of the guarantee.
- 3 Whether Willdav’s knowledge or consent to the financing arrangements affected its liability under the guarantee.
Ratio Decidendi
The guarantee executed by Willdav Engineering S.A. remained effective to cover Automold’s residual liability for the purchase price of goods supplied by Wittmann (UK) Limited, notwithstanding the financing arrangements with third-party finance companies. The original obligation was not wholly discharged but merely reduced by the sums paid by the finance companies, and the guarantee continued to apply to the outstanding balance. The guarantee’s terms and the parties’ knowledge and intentions supported this construction. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment for Wittmann (UK) Limited for the outstanding sum under the guarantee.
- Willdav Engineering S.A. remains liable for Automold’s residual liability under the guarantee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment