Company Developments (Finance) Ltd v Coffee Club Restaurants Ltd & Ors
The court held that, despite the omission in clause 1.28, it is clear as a matter of construction that the Liability Period for the original guarantors is the period during which the Original Tenant is bound by the tenant's covenants. The limitation on liability is set out in clause 6.1.1, and the lease should be construed accordingly. The appeal is dismissed and the guarantors remain liable for the sums ordered.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Company Developments (Finance) Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Coffee Club Restaurants Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Mr O’Connor; Defendant/appellant: Mr Prashad
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee Liability, Lease Construction, Rectification, Contractual Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Company Developments (Finance) Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Coffee Club Restaurants Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Mr O’Connor
Defendant/appellant
Mr Prashad
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can construe or imply a definition of 'Liability Period' for original guarantors in the lease
- 2 Whether the omission in clause 1.28 renders the guarantors not liable
- 3 Whether the lease should be rectified to include the omitted provision
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, despite the omission in clause 1.28, it is clear as a matter of construction that the Liability Period for the original guarantors is the period during which the Original Tenant is bound by the tenant's covenants. The limitation on liability is set out in clause 6.1.1, and the lease should be construed accordingly. The appeal is dismissed and the guarantors remain liable for the sums ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment for the claimant against the second and third defendants for £158,682.09 plus interest of £15,089.58 and costs, with £25,000 payable on account of costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment