Clarke, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government & The Regions [2002] EWCA Civ 819 (20 May 2002)
The Inspector's decision was quashed due to inadequate reasoning regarding the Clarkes' gypsy status and their aversion to conventional housing; the matter must be remitted for a fresh determination with more intense scrutiny of the facts relevant to Article 8 and 14 ECHR.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 819
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Thomas George Clarke; Defendant/appellant: Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Administrative Court (queen's Bench Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; matter remitted to Inspector for fresh determination.
- Legal Topics
- Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation, Article 8 ECHR, Article 14 ECHR, Planning Permission, Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas George Clarke
Claimant/respondent
Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Court (queen's Bench Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector's reasoning in refusing planning permission for a gypsy caravan site was adequate
- 2 Whether refusal of planning permission breached Articles 8 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector's decision was quashed due to inadequate reasoning regarding the Clarkes' gypsy status and their aversion to conventional housing; the matter must be remitted for a fresh determination with more intense scrutiny of the facts relevant to Article 8 and 14 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; matter remitted to Inspector for fresh determination.
Orders
- Inspector to reconsider the planning application with proper reasoning regarding gypsy status and aversion to conventional housing.
- Appellant's costs to be assessed in accordance with the Community Legal Service (Costs) Regulations 2000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment