Basildon District Council, R (on the application of) v First Secretary of State & Anor

Basildon District Council, R (on the application of) v First Secretary of State & Anor

The inspector properly considered all relevant matters, including the defendants' ethnic background, past nomadic lifestyle, intention to resume travelling, and reasons for ceasing to travel. The inspector gave adequate reasons and made no error of law in concluding the defendants retained Gypsy status. The claimants failed to establish any flaw in the inspector's decision.

Parties
Claimant: Basildon District Council; First Defendant: First Secretary of State; Second Defendant: Rachel Cooper; Third Defendant: Elizabeth Cooper
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 October 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning Appeal) / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Gypsy Status, Planning Permission, Statutory Interpretation, Costs
Administrative Law Planning Law Gypsy Status Planning Permission Statutory Interpretation Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Basildon District Council

Claimant

First Secretary of State

First Defendant

Rachel Cooper

Second Defendant

Elizabeth Cooper

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review (planning Appeal) / Judgment After Substantive Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the inspector erred in law or failed to give adequate reasons for determining the defendants retained Gypsy status
  2. 2 Whether the inspector failed to take into account relevant matters in assessing Gypsy status under the statutory definition

Ratio Decidendi

The inspector properly considered all relevant matters, including the defendants' ethnic background, past nomadic lifestyle, intention to resume travelling, and reasons for ceasing to travel. The inspector gave adequate reasons and made no error of law in concluding the defendants retained Gypsy status. The claimants failed to establish any flaw in the inspector's decision.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; inspector's decision stands
  • Claimant to pay the second and third defendants' costs, with agent's attendance reduced from £720 to £400; total costs to be calculated and notified to the associate