Hilali v Governor of HMP Whitemoor & Ors
The writ of habeas corpus must issue because the factual basis for the extradition order has been fundamentally undermined by the Spanish Supreme Court's ruling that the telephone intercept evidence is inadmissible. Without this evidence, the EAW does not disclose an extradition offence under section 64(3) or (4) of the Extradition Act 2003, and the applicant's continued detention is unlawful.
- Parties
- Claimant: Farid Hilali; First Respondent: Governor of HMP Whitemoor; Second Respondent: Central Court of Committal Proceedings No 5, The High Court, Madrid; Intervener: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Habeas Corpus / Judgment on Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Following Exhaustion of Extradition Statutory Appeals
- Outcome
- Application for writ of habeas corpus granted; detention unlawful.
- Legal Topics
- Habeas Corpus, European Arrest Warrant, Extradition Act 2003, Article 5 ECHR, Jurisdiction, Res Judicata, Evidentiary Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Farid Hilali
Claimant
Governor of HMP Whitemoor
First Respondent
Central Court of Committal Proceedings No 5, The High Court, Madrid
Second Respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Habeas Corpus / Judgment on Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Following Exhaustion of Extradition Statutory Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether habeas corpus is available after completion of statutory extradition proceedings under the Extradition Act 2003
- 2 Whether the factual basis for the extradition order has been undermined by subsequent events
- 3 Whether continued detention is unlawful and in breach of Article 5 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The writ of habeas corpus must issue because the factual basis for the extradition order has been fundamentally undermined by the Spanish Supreme Court's ruling that the telephone intercept evidence is inadmissible. Without this evidence, the EAW does not disclose an extradition offence under section 64(3) or (4) of the Extradition Act 2003, and the applicant's continued detention is unlawful.
Court Disposition
Application for writ of habeas corpus granted; detention unlawful.
Orders
- Writ of habeas corpus to issue; applicant to be released from detention.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment