Hart District Council, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Ors
There is no legal requirement that a screening assessment under Regulation 48(1) must be carried out in the absence of mitigation measures that form part of a plan or project. The competent authority is required to consider whether the project, as a whole, including such measures, is likely to have a significant effect on the SPA. If satisfied, on objective information, that there is no likely significant effect, no appropriate assessment is required. The Secretary of State lawfully preferred Natural England's expert view, properly considered material considerations, and acted within her discretion regarding housing land supply and planning conditions.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hart District Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Luckmore Limited; Third Defendant: Barratt Homes Limited; First Interested Party: Taylor Wimpey Developments Limited; Second Interested Party: Natural England
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Habitats Directive, Appropriate Assessment, Planning Permission, Environmental Impact, Judicial Review, Housing Land Supply, Planning Conditions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hart District Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Luckmore Limited
Second Defendant
Barratt Homes Limited
Third Defendant
Taylor Wimpey Developments Limited
First Interested Party
Natural England
Second Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether mitigation measures can be considered at the screening stage under Regulation 48(1) of the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State erred in law by not requiring an appropriate assessment for the proposed development's effect on the SPA
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State failed to consider material considerations including the Inspector's report and the Technical Assessor's report
Ratio Decidendi
There is no legal requirement that a screening assessment under Regulation 48(1) must be carried out in the absence of mitigation measures that form part of a plan or project. The competent authority is required to consider whether the project, as a whole, including such measures, is likely to have a significant effect on the SPA. If satisfied, on objective information, that there is no likely significant effect, no appropriate assessment is required. The Secretary of State lawfully preferred Natural England's expert view, properly considered material considerations, and acted within her discretion regarding housing land supply and planning conditions.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claimant to pay the first defendant's costs, summarily assessed at £18,441.25
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment